Comments on: IS THE ESTOPPEL EFFECT OF INTER PARTES REEXAMINATION A VALID DETERRENT TO FILING? (PART 1 OF 2) http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/is-the-estoppel-effect-of-inter-partes-reexamination-a-valid-deterrent-to-filing-part-1-of-2 Patents Post Grant is the leading legal blog, providing daily insight into patent reexamination, patent reissue and post grant review strategies. Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:51:43 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Chico Gholz http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/is-the-estoppel-effect-of-inter-partes-reexamination-a-valid-deterrent-to-filing-part-1-of-2/comment-page-1#comment-18 Chico Gholz Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:11:49 +0000 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/?p=571#comment-18 The estoppel effect of losing an interference can be even worse than the estoppel effect of losing an inter partes reexamination. See Gholz and Wilcox, "Interference Estoppel is Worse Than Issue Preclusion," 15 Intellectual Property Today No. 6 at page 14 (2008). CHICO The estoppel effect of losing an interference can be even worse than the estoppel effect of losing an inter partes reexamination. See Gholz and Wilcox, “Interference Estoppel is Worse Than Issue Preclusion,” 15 Intellectual Property Today No. 6 at page 14 (2008).

CHICO

]]>