• Subscribe

    Subscribe to the RSS feed Subscribe to the blogs's ATOM feed
    Add to your Google Home Page or Google Reader Add to your My Yahoo!
    Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL
    Subscribe to the Comments RSS feed Add to your Bloglines
    Email Subscription

  • The opinions, commentary and characterizations provided to this online forum by the authors and moderators are provided for encouraging discussion, thought and debate on important post grant issues. These postings are in no way representative of the opinions of Oblon Spivak et al., or its clients.

PTAB to Get Explicit Pro Hac Vice Policing Powers

Posted On: Oct. 18, 2012   By: Scott A. McKeown
USPTO_ethicsUSPTO Adopts ABA Model Rules

Today the USPTO will publish a notice in the Federal Register to update the USPTO Rules of Professional Responsibility and to revise procedures for disciplinary investigations and proceedings. (reading room copy here). The notice explains that the notice of proposed rulemaking is designed to align USPTO Rules of Professional Responsibility with that of most other U.S. jurisdictions.

Of particular interest for post grant patent practitioners is Proposed Rules 11.19(a).

Proposed Rule 11.19(a) is revised to expressly provide jurisdiction over non-registered practitioners that provide or offer to provide legal services before the Office. This provision would allow the USPTO to more effectively police non-registered practitioners such as those that may apply to appear before the PTAB on a pro hac vice basis.

Comments are closed.