• Subscribe

    Subscribe to the RSS feed Subscribe to the blogs's ATOM feed
    Add to your Google Home Page or Google Reader Add to your My Yahoo!
    Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL
    Subscribe to the Comments RSS feed Add to your Bloglines
    Email Subscription



  • The opinions, commentary and characterizations provided to this online forum by the authors and moderators are provided for encouraging discussion, thought and debate on important post grant issues. These postings are in no way representative of the opinions of Oblon Spivak et al., or its clients.

Archive for January 10th, 2013

First Business Method Patent Trial Ordered by USPTO

Posted On: Jan. 10, 2013   By: Scott A. McKeown
Covered Business MethodFirst Covered Business Method Challenge Ordered Based on SAP Petition

The Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) has ordered the very first business method patentability trial of the America Invents Act. The first petition for a Covered Business Method Patent Challenge (CBM) was filed on September 16th by SAP (CBM2012-00001). The petition (here) challenged U.S. Patent  6,553,350 of Versata Development Group. In May of 2011, Versata secured a $345 million dollar verdict in the Eastern District of Texas against SAP ($260 million in lost profits and $85 million as a reasonable royalty). The verdict is currently on appeal to the CAFC.

Yesterday, the PTAB held that SAP’s petition had demonstrated that it was more likely than not that the claims of the ‘350 patent were unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 and 102 (Trial Order here). The PTAB also set the trial schedule, mandating that the oral hearing be conducted by October 1, 2013. (scheduling Order) This schedule would provide for a written decision of the PTAB in roughly 10-12 months from yesterday’s Order, as mandated by statute.

For obvious reasons, I provide no substantive commentary.