• Subscribe

    Subscribe to the RSS feed Subscribe to the blogs's ATOM feed
    Add to your Google Home Page or Google Reader Add to your My Yahoo!
    Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL
    Subscribe to the Comments RSS feed Add to your Bloglines
    Email Subscription

  • The opinions, commentary and characterizations provided to this online forum by the authors and moderators are provided for encouraging discussion, thought and debate on important post grant issues. These postings are in no way representative of the opinions of Oblon Spivak et al., or its clients.

CAFC Denies Stay in View of PTAB’s First CBM Decision

Posted On: Jul. 9, 2013   By: Scott A. McKeown
stay pending CBMPTAB Written Decision Cancelling Claims of Patent Does Not Give CAFC Pause

The CAFC denied SAP’s request to stay the further processing of their appeal (SAP is seeking en banc review) pending rehearing of the USPTO’s Patent Trial & Appeal Board’s (PTAB) recent written decision cancelling the claims of the patent-at-issue. The simple one page order (here) denies the requested relief without elaboration. Given the Court’s history with similar requests, the outcome is not surprising. Still as made clear in last week’s Baxter decision, until judgment is actually executed against SAP, the race to the finish will continue. That is to say, the CBM will makes its way onto the CAFC appeal docket in a matter of months while the pending district court appeal goes through the en banc and petition for certiorari stages.

SAP filed the very first petition for a Covered Business Method Patent Challenge (CBM) on September 16th (CBM2012-00001). The petition (here) challenged U.S. Patent 6,553,350 of Versata Development Group. In May of 2011, Versata secured a $391 million dollar verdict in the Eastern District of Texas against SAP. The verdict was upheld by the CAFC some weeks ago, but SAP is now seeking en banc review.

Comments are closed.