• Subscribe

    Subscribe to the RSS feed Subscribe to the blogs's ATOM feed
    Add to your Google Home Page or Google Reader Add to your My Yahoo!
    Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL
    Subscribe to the Comments RSS feed Add to your Bloglines
    Email Subscription

  • The opinions, commentary and characterizations provided to this online forum by the authors and moderators are provided for encouraging discussion, thought and debate on important post grant issues. These postings are in no way representative of the opinions of Oblon Spivak et al., or its clients.

Archive for January 17th, 2014

2014 Update on PTAB Trial Statistics

Posted On: Jan. 17, 2014   By: Scott A. McKeown
PTABStatistics Demonstrate Staggering Demand for PTAB Patent Challenge Proceedings

Last week, the USPTO issued the official tallies/progress statistics for Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post Grant Review (PGR) and the Covered Business Method (CBM) proceedings. As of January 9, 2014 the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) has received 810 IPR petitions and 108 CBM petitions, 922 petitions in total. Since the last update on November 7, 2013, the PTAB has seen 200 additional petition filings, quite impressive given the holiday season.

(Click to Enlarge)aia_pets_01_09_2014

Not surprisingly, the vast majority of IPR petitions remain in the predictable arts, significant concentrations being in consumer electronics and mobile communication technologies. (a favorite haunt of non-practicing entities (NPEs))

aia_tech_01_09_2014Although difficult to gauge from the numbers due to the lag in filing of preliminary responses across yearly boundaries, it seems that patent owner’s are beginning to appreciate the limited value of preliminary responses.  aia_PR_01_09_2014


Based upon early numbers, the settlement rate appears to be leveling out at around 15-20%. As more proceedings mature toward written decision the rate may increase. Of course, it is within the discretion of the PTAB to continue to written decision for late stage settlements, especially those attempted after the patent owner response. (See CBM2012-00007)