• Subscribe

    Subscribe to the RSS feed Subscribe to the blogs's ATOM feed
    Add to your Google Home Page or Google Reader Add to your My Yahoo!
    Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL
    Subscribe to the Comments RSS feed Add to your Bloglines
    Email Subscription

  • The opinions, commentary and characterizations provided to this online forum by the authors and moderators are provided for encouraging discussion, thought and debate on important post grant issues. These postings are in no way representative of the opinions of Oblon Spivak et al., or its clients.

CAFC Shuts Down Attempts to Review PTAB Trial Determinations

Posted On: Apr. 25, 2014   By: Scott A. McKeown
CAFC IPR AppealStatutory Prohibition Against Appellate Review Of IPR Institution Decisions

Yesterday, in three separate decisions, the CAFC made clear that the grant/denial of an IPR by the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) is not reviewable. The CAFC based their decisions on 35 U.S.C. § 314(d), which states:

No Appeal.— The determination by the Director whether to institute an inter partes review under this section shall be final and nonappealable.

The Court denied two writs of mandamus that challenged the PTAB decision to deny IPRs in Dominion Dealerhere) and grant IPRs (Proctor & Gamble (here). The CAFC also granted a motions to dismiss a pending appeals from a failed IPR petition filing (Volcano (here).

There seem to be two factors driving such “creative lawyering.” One, a failed IPR may leave a petitioner outside of the 12 month window with no option but the district court, and two, patentees subject to PTAB review are struggling mightily with the idea that no amount of legal maneuvering/theatrics can stall the speed of the PTAB.

Comments are closed.