<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Evidence of a Concurrent Reexamination Admissible in Litigation? (Part I of IV)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/ja/2010/01/is-evidence-of-a-concurrent-reexamination-admissible-in-litigation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/ja/2010/01/is-evidence-of-a-concurrent-reexamination-admissible-in-litigation</link>
	<description>Patents Post Grant is the leading legal blog, providing daily insight into patent reexamination, patent reissue and post grant review strategies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:51:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is Evidence of a Concurrent Reexamination Admissible in Litigation? (Part II of IV) &#124; Patents Post Grant Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/ja/2010/01/is-evidence-of-a-concurrent-reexamination-admissible-in-litigation/comment-page-1#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Evidence of a Concurrent Reexamination Admissible in Litigation? (Part II of IV) &#124; Patents Post Grant Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentspostgrant.com/?p=858#comment-140</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Evidence of a Concurrent Reexamination Admissible in Litigation? (Part II of IV)  Posted On: Jan. 27, 2010&#160;&#160; By: Robert C. Mattson and Lindsay J. Kile   Topics: Concurrent Proceedings, Reexamination [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Evidence of a Concurrent Reexamination Admissible in Litigation? (Part II of IV)  Posted On: Jan. 27, 2010&nbsp;&nbsp; By: Robert C. Mattson and Lindsay J. Kile   Topics: Concurrent Proceedings, Reexamination [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

