http://www.patentspostgrant.com/ 2010-03-10T11:14:24+00:00 daily 1.0 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/uspto-offers-best-practice-tips-for-reissues 2010-03-10T04:59:58+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/1609 2010-03-08T23:56:21+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/epo-opposition-procedures-a-comparison-with-inter-partes-reexamination-in-the-uspto 2010-03-07T20:11:59+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/post-grant-review-changes-to-s-515-taking-shape 2010-03-05T05:37:29+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/1532 2010-03-04T01:45:41+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/stacking-the-deck-against-viagra 2010-03-03T05:17:37+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/one-two-punch 2010-02-28T05:17:40+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/deal-appears-imminent-on-patent-reform-legislation 2010-02-26T05:40:57+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/the-uspto%e2%80%99s-central-reexamination-unit 2010-02-25T02:41:59+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/upcoming-post-grant-cle-opportunities 2010-02-24T19:00:34+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/making-your-reexamination-news-risky-business 2010-02-24T05:20:37+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/ex-parte-tanaka-heading-to-cafc 2010-02-24T00:22:18+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/texas2step 2010-02-19T18:15:38+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/1401 2010-02-18T04:25:11+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/peeling-back-the-layers-of-tanaka-patent-owner-initiated-reexamination-as-an-alternative-to-reissue 2010-02-17T05:25:17+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/useful-links 2010-02-16T21:45:26+00:00 weekly 0.6 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/design-patents-reexamination-an-interview-with-industrial-design-expert-philippe-signore 2010-02-16T21:14:24+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/does-mpep-22582658-h-encourage-improper-reexamination-requests 2010-02-16T05:25:42+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/seeking-a-stay-of-patent-litigation-a-factors-based-analysis 2010-02-10T18:12:10+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/effectively-presenting-a-request-for-patent-reexamination-part-ii-what-exactly-is-a-substantial-new-question-of-patentability-anyway 2010-02-10T06:11:33+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/is-evidence-of-a-concurrent-reexamination-admissible-in-litigation-part-iv-of-iv 2010-02-08T20:08:24+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/patent-reform-percolating 2010-02-06T16:58:01+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/upcoming-pli-presentations-and-webcasts-reexamination-reissue 2010-02-03T06:21:30+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/are-the-rambus-patent-rexaminations-irrelevant 2010-02-02T05:19:08+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/uspto-reexamination-of-means-plus-function-claims 2010-02-01T01:29:25+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/is-evidence-of-a-concurrent-reexamination-admissible-in-litigation-part-iii-of-iv 2010-01-31T05:01:43+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/moving-toward-a-more-efficient-inter-partes-reexamination-proceeding 2010-01-29T05:47:54+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/patent-office-releases-2009-reexamination-stats 2010-01-27T16:28:30+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/is-evidence-of-a-concurrent-reexamination-admissible-in-litigation-part-ii-of-iv 2010-01-22T05:34:46+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/husky%e2%80%99s-motion-for-stay-of-patent-litigation-denied-when-requests-for-reexamination-of-the-three-patents-in-suit-had-not-yet-received-filing-dates 2010-01-22T05:33:48+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/is-evidence-of-a-concurrent-reexamination-admissible-in-litigation 2010-01-20T22:31:47+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/fotomedia-patents-finally-rejected-in-reexamination 2010-01-19T22:48:09+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/cook%e2%80%99s-patent-litigation-against-endologix-stayed-pending-reexamination-of-the-stent-patents-in-suit 2010-01-18T01:00:22+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/%e2%80%9cnose-of-wax%e2%80%9d-revisited-and-should-35-usc-%c2%a7-145-be-revised-to-apply-to-reexaminations 2010-01-15T16:30:59+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/is-the-declaration-of-an-interference-enough-to-stay-a-district-court-litigation 2010-01-15T16:30:28+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/to-search-or-not-to-search-for-prior-art-when-contemplating-whether-to-request-an-inter-partes-reexamination-or-an-interference 2010-01-15T05:23:33+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/district-court-grants-stay-prior-to-grant-of-request-for-reexamination 2010-01-14T21:30:40+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/are-patent-trolls-more-vulnerable-to-reexamination-in-the-eastern-district-of-texas 2010-01-10T05:37:14+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/stay-pending-reexamination-denied-because-a-stay-would-result-in-more-significant-prejudice-given-the-courts-overall-speed-in-disposing-patent-cases 2010-01-10T05:35:10+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/effectively-presenting-a-request-for-patent-reexamination 2010-01-09T05:16:13+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/attacking-patent-holder-declaration-evidence-via-reexamination 2010-01-06T15:24:10+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/bpai-affirms-rejection-of-patent-reexaminations-of-ntp-v-rim-fame 2009-12-26T02:30:43+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/reexamination-concurrent-with-litigation-malpractice-considerations-n-d-ill 2009-12-26T02:26:19+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/singulair-reexamination-advances-to-favorable-conclusion 2009-12-26T02:22:27+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/e-d-va-declines-sigram-schindlers-bid-to-revisit-options-for-review-of-bpai-decisions-in-ex-parte-reexamination 2009-12-26T02:19:22+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/726 2009-12-26T01:23:01+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/satisfying-the-duty-of-disclosure-in-reexamination-concurrent-with-litigation-without-violating-a-protective-order 2009-12-22T15:11:48+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/is-the-mere-existence-of-a-newly-filed-inter-partes-reexamination-request-enough-to-stay-a-district-court-litigation 2009-12-21T03:09:19+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/use-of-assignee-consent-and-oathdeclaration-from-parent-reissue-application-in-a-continuation-reissue-is-there-an-exception-to-mpep-%c2%a7-1451 2009-12-18T16:32:12+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/is-the-estoppel-effect-of-inter-partes-reexamination-a-valid-deterrent-to-filing-part-2-of-2 2009-12-17T19:06:53+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/when-is-a-supplemental-reissue-oath-declaration-required 2009-12-17T00:09:38+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/is-the-estoppel-effect-of-inter-partes-reexamination-a-valid-deterrent-to-filing-part-1-of-2 2009-12-16T15:58:57+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/an-inter-partes-reexamination-primer-part-1-of-2 2009-12-13T04:00:44+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/the-evolution-of-mpep-22822686 2009-12-10T14:09:50+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/ex-parte-brp-us-inc 2009-12-09T15:23:05+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/final-decision-ex-parte-patrick-d-mccarthy 2009-12-09T15:22:42+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/roy-g-biv-corporation 2009-12-09T15:22:21+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/in-re-troll-busters-beware-failure-to-disclose-real-party-in-interest-when-filing-an-inter-partes-reexamination 2009-12-09T15:21:16+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/avoiding-reliance-on-the-doctrine-of-equivalents-through-patent-reissuance 2009-12-08T00:18:43+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/bpai-reexamination-appeals-statistics-for-fy-09 2009-12-08T00:17:15+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/concurrent-proceedings-patent-owner-compliance-with-mpep-%c2%a7-2282 2009-12-06T16:24:18+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/ipos-pto-day-conference-december-7-2009 2009-12-01T20:55:37+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/are-patent-claims-treated-like-a-%e2%80%9cnose-of-wax%e2%80%9d-at-the-u-s-p-t-o 2009-12-01T14:28:42+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/are-patent-claims-treated-like-a-%e2%80%9cnose-of-wax%e2%80%9d-at-the-u-s-p-t-o 2009-12-01T00:27:42+00:00 weekly 0.6 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/the-bpai-finds-patents-claims-in-reexamination-proceeding-indefinite 2009-11-23T18:11:17+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/patent-reform-derailed-again 2009-11-20T16:23:24+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/attacking-a-patent-in-reexamination-for-lack-of-written-description-and-enablement 2009-11-18T23:47:29+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/are-the-principles-set-forth-in-ex-parte-bayles-good-law-do-these-principles-apply-to-continuation-reissues 2009-11-18T12:43:25+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/inter-partes-reexamination-primer-part-2-of-2 2009-11-18T12:35:57+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/patent-praxis-the-innocuous-examiner-amendment 2009-11-17T16:13:12+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/the-role-of-opla-in-reexamination-proceedings-part-2-of-3 2009-11-17T16:09:09+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/the-role-of-opla-in-reexamination-proceedings 2009-11-17T16:04:21+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/the-role-of-opla-in-reexamination-proceedings-part-3-of-3 2009-11-17T15:57:44+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/the-role-of-opla-in-reexamination-proceedings-part-2-of-3 2009-11-17T15:54:25+00:00 weekly 0.6 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/merck%e2%80%99s-singulair-patent-survives-reexamination 2009-11-16T20:36:42+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/inter-partes-reexamination-the-international-trade-commission-itc 2009-11-13T20:04:08+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/welcome 2009-11-13T20:02:07+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/strategic-application-of-patent-reexamination-in-litigation-avoiding-a-preliminary-injunction 2009-11-13T20:01:47+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/options-for-judicial-review-of-ex-parte-reexamination-decisions 2009-11-13T19:58:52+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/merged-post-grant-proceedings 2009-11-13T19:58:20+00:00 monthly 0.2 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/takahiro-miura 2009-11-09T22:23:12+00:00 weekly 0.6 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/subscribe 2009-11-08T18:00:34+00:00 weekly 0.6 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/top-5-blog-posts 2009-11-08T18:00:18+00:00 weekly 0.6 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/news-events 2009-11-08T17:59:48+00:00 weekly 0.6 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/contact-us 2009-11-08T17:58:37+00:00 weekly 0.6 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/vincent-k-shier 2009-11-06T17:29:57+00:00 weekly 0.6 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/scott-a-mckeown 2009-11-06T17:29:22+00:00 weekly 0.6 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/w-todd-baker 2009-11-06T17:28:50+00:00 weekly 0.6 http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/stephen-g-kunin 2009-11-06T17:28:01+00:00 weekly 0.6