<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.patentspostgrant.com/wp-content/plugins/google-sitemap-generator/sitemap.xsl"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.8.5" -->
<!-- sitemap-generator-url="http://www.arnebrachhold.de" sitemap-generator-version="3.2.1" -->
<!-- generated-on="2 February 2012 4:12" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd" xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9">	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/</loc>
		<lastmod>2012-02-02T09:10:33+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>daily</changefreq>
		<priority>1.0</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2012/02/cafc-considers-stay-pending-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2012-02-02T03:20:27+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2012/02/post-grant-proceedings-2012-the-new-patent-litigation</loc>
		<lastmod>2012-02-01T18:54:20+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2012/01/cafc-again-considers-patent-reexamination-disclaimer</loc>
		<lastmod>2012-01-31T14:38:51+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2012/01/uspto-fee-setting-designed-to-influence-filing-behaviors</loc>
		<lastmod>2012-01-30T04:37:47+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2012/01/supplemental-examination-rules-issued-by-uspto</loc>
		<lastmod>2012-01-26T21:08:51+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2012/01/uspto-proposes-400-600-increase-in-patent-reexamination-fees</loc>
		<lastmod>2012-01-25T02:00:39+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2012/01/post-grant-buzz-winter-2012</loc>
		<lastmod>2012-01-23T18:53:49+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2012/01/evidence-of-ongoing-patent-reexamination-at-trial</loc>
		<lastmod>2012-01-17T19:47:32+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/scott-a-mckeown</loc>
		<lastmod>2012-01-11T17:10:26+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>weekly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.6</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2012/01/7842</loc>
		<lastmod>2012-01-11T16:50:38+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2012/01/patent-reissue-oath-practice-revised-by-uspto</loc>
		<lastmod>2012-01-11T03:30:56+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2012/01/uspto-to-revise-ex-parte-reexamination-procedures</loc>
		<lastmod>2012-01-09T01:40:00+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2012/01/new-appeal-rules-seminar-for-2012</loc>
		<lastmod>2012-01-05T16:09:20+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2012/01/settlement-agreements-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2012-01-05T03:56:06+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2012/01/2011-year-in-review-patent-reform-post-grant-landscape</loc>
		<lastmod>2012-01-03T04:15:54+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/12/ntp-patents-resurface-from-uspto-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-12-21T16:16:02+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/12/uspto-expands-prioritized-examination-program</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-12-20T04:28:38+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/12/court-rejects-uspto-art-analysis-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-12-14T16:35:05+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/12/judge-newman-questions-constitutionality-of-second-chance-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-12-12T14:30:46+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/12/can-the-uspto-be-sued-under-the-apa-for-issuing-bad-patents</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-12-08T04:08:11+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/12/record-patent-reexamination-filings-in-2011</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-12-06T22:09:13+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/12/uspto-updates-public-on-rule-making-efforts</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-12-02T03:03:48+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/11/patent-trial-appeal-board-rules-drafted-by-major-bar-associations</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-11-30T03:18:27+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/11/uspto-director-to-host-aia-webinar-tomorrow</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-11-28T23:53:59+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/11/uspto-issues-new-appeal-rules</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-11-27T04:10:54+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/11/patent-reexamination-speed-impresses-district-court</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-11-23T03:13:07+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/11/uspto-secures-increased-funding-for-2012</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-11-20T19:04:43+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/11/patent-reexamination-stops-patent-trolls</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-11-17T03:54:07+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/11/scope-of-business-method-patent-challenge-to-be-decided-by-uspto</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-11-16T03:52:07+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/11/tech-giants-weigh-in-on-post-grant-rule-making</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-11-14T04:09:17+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/11/will-you-be-qualified-to-practice-before-the-ptab</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-11-09T20:05:46+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/11/uspto-finalizing-first-wave-of-rule-aia-rule-packages</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-11-07T03:56:59+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/11/when-to-petitionappeal-at-the-uspto</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-11-04T04:34:17+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/11/greg-gardella-joins-oblon-post-grant-team</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-11-01T16:50:35+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/10/500-new-claims-in-patent-reexamination-backfire-on-plaintiff</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-10-30T21:30:37+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/10/uspto-to-host-webinar-on-aia-implementation</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-10-27T22:33:29+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/10/the-estoppel-disconnect-of-inter-partes-review</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-10-26T06:35:34+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/10/un-staying-litigation-despite-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-10-24T06:22:23+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/10/patent-reissue-oath</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-10-20T01:48:27+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/10/post-grant-dead-zone-coming-soon</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-10-17T01:22:47+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/10/how-much-will-post-grant-proceedings-at-the-uspto-cost</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-10-13T12:06:28+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/10/how-long-will-inter-partes-review-really-take</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-10-12T08:21:56+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/10/microsofts-failure-in-second-reexamination-of-i4i-patent-final</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-10-09T08:56:06+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/10/new-rejection-in-patent-reexamination-remanded-by-cafc</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-10-06T14:08:57+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/10/supreme-court-denies-sham-patent-reexamination-case</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-10-05T02:47:41+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/10/cafc-sides-with-uspto-on-inter-partes-reexamiantion-estoppel-timing</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-10-04T03:33:24+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/10/inter-partes-review-estoppel-to-unmask-anonymous-filers</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-10-03T03:17:15+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/09/new-inter-partes-review</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-09-29T05:03:28+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/09/cafc-finds-intervening-rights-apply-to-post-grant-disclaimer</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-09-27T13:22:33+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/09/post-grant-practice-under-the-aia-webcast-september-28th</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-09-23T03:43:26+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/09/uspto-prepares-to-end-inter-partes-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-09-22T12:21:07+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/09/older-patents-soon-subject-to-inter-partes-challenge</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-09-21T22:24:52+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/09/uspto-post-grant-cheat-sheet</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-09-21T15:09:32+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/09/uspto-fee-increases-effective-september-26th</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-09-19T22:30:45+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/09/uspto-advances-laches-theory-to-deny-broadening-patent-reissue</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-09-14T04:19:47+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/09/america-invents-act-to-be-enacted-september-16th</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-09-14T04:18:43+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/09/the-post-grant-buzz-fall-2011</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-09-13T02:51:57+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/09/patent-reform-now-a-reality</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-09-09T04:14:09+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/09/kickoff-thursday</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-09-08T13:21:34+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/09/senate-backs-america-invents-act-93-5</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-09-07T14:31:37+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/09/patent-reform-final-countdown</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-09-06T14:57:10+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/09/when-is-a-claim-finally-cancelled-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-09-01T03:09:24+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/declaratory-judgement-less-attractive-after-patent-reform</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-31T02:56:20+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/patent-reform-and-inter-partes-review</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-29T01:56:37+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/uspto-changes-patent-reissue-practice</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-24T03:59:06+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/important-patent-reexamination-standard-to-change-in-30-days</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-22T04:24:12+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/how-much-does-patent-reexamination-cost</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-22T01:40:02+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/aba-blawg-100</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-18T21:32:45+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/can-patent-reexamination-be-used-to-undo-a-markman-order</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-18T02:30:35+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/post-trial-patent-reexamination-opportunities</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-17T02:14:20+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/google-takes-on-lodsys-at-uspto</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-16T02:35:43+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/therasense-drives-summary-judgment-victory-for-reissue-patentee</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-15T16:23:25+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/business-method-patent-challenges-in-store-for-uspto</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-12T04:29:46+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/permanent-injunction-status-undermined-by-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-09T18:01:11+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/112-snq-practice</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-08T03:42:03+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/cafc-validity-determination-erased-by-appellant-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-04T22:49:05+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/senate-eyes-september-enactment-for-patent-reform</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-02T18:49:26+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/cafc-sends-ntp-patent-reexaminations-back-to-uspto</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-01T18:04:05+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/08/can-a-forum-selection-clause-halt-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-08-01T03:05:59+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/07/monkeymedia-stay-no-longer-extra-special</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-29T19:38:18+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/07/court-orders-extra-special-dispatch-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-29T13:05:30+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/07/uspto-prepares-for-historic-rule-making-effort</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-26T22:30:12+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/07/snq-plus-a-new-game-for-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-26T02:01:42+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/07/mixing-the-duty-of-candor-with-the-duty-of-disclosure</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-25T03:24:24+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/07/uspto-proposes-changes-to-materiality-standard</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-21T15:27:16+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/07/the-post-grant-buzz-summer-2011</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-20T02:59:40+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/05/cafc-tightens-inequitable-conduct-standards-in-therasense</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-19T04:00:41+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/07/the-impact-of-therasense-on-patent-reform</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-19T04:00:06+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/07/aipla-comments-on-usptos-reexamination-proposals</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-18T02:29:18+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/07/the-historical-skew-of-inter-partes-pendency-figures</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-14T01:38:46+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/07/uspto-prepares-for-patent-reform</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-13T03:38:30+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/07/patent-reissue-patent-reform-webinars-today</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-11T23:23:14+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/07/patent-reform-awaits-senate-compromise-on-debt-ceiling</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-11T04:19:20+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/07/manner-of-making-amendments-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-08T03:26:11+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/07/uspto-receives-comments-on-patent-reexamination-proposals</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-04T15:46:06+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/07/upcoming-patent-reissue-program</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-07-04T15:13:40+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/reigning-in-patent-reexamination-grant-rates</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-29T01:49:59+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/patent-reform-close-enough-for-government-work</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-28T15:46:52+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/judge-by-judge-statistics-on-stays-pending-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-28T02:03:12+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/patent-reform-bill-passes-house</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-24T00:04:10+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/patent-reform-approaches-tipping-point</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-22T14:31:02+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/paul-allens-infringement-campaign-halted-by-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-21T03:29:12+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/streamlining-petition-practice-in-inter-partes-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-20T03:14:13+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/bpai-considers-patent-reissue-oath-directed-only-to-new-claims</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-16T13:06:31+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/patent-reform-the-remix</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-14T16:43:19+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/thereasense-decision-inter-partes-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-14T00:56:53+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/patent-reexamination-streamlining-waiver-of-patent-owner-statement</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-13T02:10:06+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/i4i-defeats-microsoft-challenge-to-clear-convincing-standard</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-09T19:17:17+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/patent-reform-coming-distractions</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-09T02:17:49+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/6247</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-08T17:16:10+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/uspto-provides-roundtable-information</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-08T01:00:17+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/patent-reexamination-interview-practices</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-07T02:52:04+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/streamlining-petition-practice-in-inter-partes-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-06T03:13:30+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/here-comes-the-patent-reform-push</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-02T13:21:11+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/06/uspto-public-meeting-on-patent-reexamination-today</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-06-01T13:54:52+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/05/recent-patent-reexamination-appeal-results</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-31T18:20:08+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/05/patent-reissue-webinar-next-week</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-27T01:35:04+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/05/proprietary-publications-as-prior-art</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-26T04:21:31+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/05/pubic-meeting-on-patent-reexamination-proposals</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-26T04:20:57+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/05/secondary-considerations-rebut-obviousness-finding</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-26T04:20:21+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/printed-publications-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-19T02:01:33+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/05/appeal-results-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-18T04:52:12+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/05/why-patent-owners-should-avoid-exceeding-page-limits</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-16T03:13:26+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/05/use-of-patent-reexamination-evidence-in-parallel-litigation</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-13T04:12:28+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/05/dispute-over-proper-use-of-patent-reexamination-pursued-to-supreme-court</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-12T03:14:49+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/05/tivo-shuts-down-microsoft-case</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-11T02:58:40+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/05/further-debate-ahead-for-america-invents-act</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-08T23:35:17+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/05/snq-review-options-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-05T22:54:22+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/05/cafc-adjusts-recapture-rule-analysis</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-04T14:13:50+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/pursuing-denied-snqs-in-inter-partes-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-03T23:37:05+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/05/judicial-correction-of-patent-claims</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-03T03:26:56+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/05/new-chief-judge-heads-to-bpai</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-05-02T01:41:04+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/court-confused-by-patent-reexamination-progress</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-28T04:19:19+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/5948</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-27T14:04:36+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/uspto-proposes-overhaul-to-patent-reexamination-proceedings</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-25T02:52:27+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/uspto-budget-crunch</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-22T01:54:51+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/cafc-affirms-rejection-of-means-plus-function-claims-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-21T05:21:10+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/uspto-fraud-squad</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-20T03:54:18+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/supreme-court-hears-microsoft-appeal-in-i4i-dispute</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-18T22:26:33+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/surviving-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-18T03:30:05+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/cafc-reverses-uspto-on-important-question-of-patent-reissue</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-15T16:15:23+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/h-r-1249-heads-to-vote</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-15T03:13:22+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/patent-reissue-demonstrates-lack-of-fraud</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-15T03:00:37+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/house-reverts-to-senate-standard-for-proposed-inter-partes-review</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-13T00:37:11+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/is-patent-reexamination-certificate-final</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-12T03:34:22+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/patent-reexamination-evidence-can-be-prejudicial-to-patentees</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-11T15:20:43+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/uspto-will-remain-open-if-u-s-government-is-shut-down</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-08T13:20:21+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/stay-continued-despite-confimed-claims</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-08T13:19:05+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/the-post-grant-buzz-spring-2011</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-06T18:12:31+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/serial-patent-reexaminations-work-against-medtronic</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-05T03:33:32+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/house-version-of-inter-partes-review-requires-wasted-time</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-04T03:53:45+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/04/additional-grounds-of-post-grant-review-expanded-in-house-bill</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-04-01T21:39:37+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/notorious-troll-patents-reconsidered</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-29T03:44:20+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/means-plus-function-claims-ignored</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-28T02:03:28+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/patent-reform-heads-into-home-stretch-next-week</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-25T20:30:43+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/u-s-govt-supports-clear-convincing-standard</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-23T11:22:26+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/patent-reexamintion-exposes-double-talk</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-23T10:00:01+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/orita-doctrine-blocks-patent-reissue</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-21T23:08:27+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/what-happens-after-a-case-is-stayed-pending-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-21T10:06:19+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/uspto-to-reset-patent-reexamination-dates-for-earthquake-victims</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-17T22:22:55+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/joint-defense-agreements-inter-partes-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-17T21:11:52+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/defendants-patent-reexamination-request-undermines-200k-fee-award</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-17T19:18:35+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/callaway-golf-loses-all-claims</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-17T04:31:28+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/patent-reexamination-statutues-support-clear-convincing-standard</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-16T21:20:49+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/survival-of-patent-reexamination-as-court-room-evidence</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-15T04:14:17+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/patent-reexamination-of-an-expired-patent</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-10T20:03:39+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/patent-reform-sails-through-senate</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-09T17:09:52+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/can-you-appeal-a-decision-to-stay-your-case</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-08T04:02:02+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/patent-reform-to-pass-senate</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-07T03:53:37+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/can-a-certificate-of-correction-go-too-far</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-04T05:46:33+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/first-inventor-to-file-vs-first-to-invent</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-03T01:03:14+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/03/patent-reform-breezing-through-senate</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-03-02T04:20:40+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/should-a-protective-order-bar-participation-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-27T20:12:57+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/cost-benefits-of-concurrent-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-25T03:21:36+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/upcoming-cle-programs</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-24T23:11:25+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/patent-reform-on-deck-at-the-senate</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-23T22:07:40+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/snq-deja-vu</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-23T04:07:48+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/06/bpai-to-review-disputed-snq-determinations-in-ex-parte-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-23T03:41:10+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/patent-reexamination-statements-haunt-katz-portfolio</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-22T02:34:01+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/when-is-a-bpai-rejection-truly-new</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-18T05:03:19+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/recapture-doctrine-considered-by-cafc</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-17T06:32:39+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/undermining-a-preliminary-injunction-via-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-16T04:52:18+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/this-week-in-patent-reform</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-15T14:32:27+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/pending-motion-for-tro-avoids-stay</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-14T06:46:44+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/ntp-patent-reexaminations-to-be-remanded-to-bpai</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-11T08:22:37+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/house-judiciary-previews-patent-reform-debate</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-10T23:51:18+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/ntp-patent-reexamination-appeals-heard-today-at-cafc</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-10T05:06:49+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/avoiding-a-stay-pending-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-09T04:01:17+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/2011-patent-reexamination-filings-continue-uptrend</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-08T05:06:53+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/patent-reexamination-statutes-before-supreme-court</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-07T15:02:49+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/patent-reform-wars-episode-iii</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-04T01:55:04+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/patent-reexamination-as-an-endless-loop</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-03T04:46:51+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/virginia-court-derides-usptos-special-dispatch</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-02T04:27:49+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/02/housekeeping-changes-to-s-23</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-01T00:30:03+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/upcoming-patent-reexaminationlitigation-tactics-cle</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-02-01T00:28:12+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/patent-reexamination-type-may-impact-stay-calculus</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-31T05:35:28+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/specification-disavowel-limits-claim-scope-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-28T03:25:41+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/patent-reform-for-business-methods-proposed</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-26T22:19:52+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/patent-reexamination-after-an-adverse-jury-verdict</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-26T04:30:12+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/hole-in-patent-reexamination-strategy-leads-to-defeat</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-25T03:21:33+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/snqs-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-24T05:42:34+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/new-patent-reform-bill-coming</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-20T23:58:47+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/callaway-golfs-last-stand-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-20T07:08:26+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/intervening-rights-as-an-equitable-defense</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-19T05:05:33+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/patent-reissue-terminal-disclaimers</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-18T04:08:50+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/patent-reform-buzz-growing</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-17T03:55:35+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/rambus-trip-up</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-14T16:19:07+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/uspto-warns-practitioners-on-petition-practice</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-14T03:28:48+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/cafc-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-12T13:32:54+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/sigram-schindler-appeal-in-patent-reexamination-fails</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-07T06:13:32+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/patentees-refuse-to-cooperate-with-uspto-patent-reexamination-pilot-program</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-06T23:17:27+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/cafc-reverses-rejection-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-06T06:26:08+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/judge-michel-ret-congressional-staffers-to-discuss-patent-reform</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-05T19:39:50+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2011/01/admissions-patent-reexamination-requests</loc>
		<lastmod>2011-01-04T06:47:14+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/microsoft-seeks-director-review-of-i4i-reexamiantion-denial</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-30T07:24:39+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/news-events</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-29T18:24:48+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>weekly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.6</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/welcome</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-29T18:04:46+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/takahiro-miura</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-29T17:59:34+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>weekly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.6</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/vincent-k-shier</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-29T17:58:45+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>weekly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.6</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/w-todd-baker</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-29T17:57:02+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>weekly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.6</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/stephen-g-kunin</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-29T17:56:34+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>weekly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.6</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/cafc-slates-patent-reexaminationreissue-disputes-for-early-2011-resolution</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-29T05:44:57+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/labcorps-failed-patent-reexamination-challenge-at-issue-in-contract-dispute</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-23T05:34:12+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/patent-reexaminationreissue-2010-2011</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-23T04:21:23+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/ebay-factors-irrelevant-to-itc-exclusion-order</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-22T05:57:03+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/judiciary-committee-organizes-in-anticipation-of-patent-reform-effort</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-21T03:40:59+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/cafc-sides-with-uspto-in-patent-reexamination-declaration-dispute</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-20T05:07:47+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/4703</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-17T05:44:41+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/post-grant-expectations-for-2011</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-17T05:27:28+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/dividedjoint-infringement-webcast-next-week</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-16T00:15:31+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/requests-for-information-in-ex-parte-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-14T07:39:47+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/06/the-use-of-secondary-indicia-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-14T06:31:34+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/examiner-requests-board-reconsider-reversal-in-patent-reexamination-appeal</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-13T06:23:57+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/settlement-discussions-explain-delayed-request-for-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-10T18:18:12+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/in-re-acer-to-follow-nintendos-lead-in-staying-case</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-09T02:55:35+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/issuance-of-continuation-patent-applications-during-litigation-undermine-willfulness-defense</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-07T06:20:36+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/defendant-seeks-to-undo-stay-pending-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-07T06:08:45+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/hedging-against-a-willfulness-finding-in-litigation-parallel-to-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-06T07:33:57+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/12/4528</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-12-02T06:36:21+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/supreme-court-to-consider-arguments-in-microsofti4i-dispute</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-30T05:41:42+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/uspto-denies-microsoft-request-to-reexamine-i4i-patent</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-30T05:40:53+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/communications-relating-to-patent-reexamiantion-are-privileged</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-29T05:37:20+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/defective-oaths-plague-patent-reissue-filings</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-23T22:28:23+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/patent-owner-control-over-ex-parte-patent-reexamination-pendency</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-22T07:45:42+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/intervening-rights-created-by-claim-cancelation-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-18T06:16:36+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/changing-gear-in-patent-reexamination-may-stall-ongoing-litigation</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-17T15:15:28+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/sham-patent-reexamination-argument-goes-nowhere</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-16T06:31:01+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/new-bpai-appeal-rules-proposed</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-15T04:23:05+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/sham-patent-reexamination-dispute-makes-it-to-cafc</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-12T07:47:28+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/court-labels-claims-transformed-in-patent-reexamination-mere-disguise</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-11T21:30:48+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/demonstrating-materiality-through-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-10T05:21:08+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/patent-reexamination-filings-at-all-time-high</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-09T03:20:28+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/patent-reform-still-on-the-table</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-05T03:37:06+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/chill-pilot-program</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-04T01:51:24+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/the-magic-of-means-plus-function-claims</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-03T03:34:04+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/itc-invalidity-holding-revisited-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-02T14:24:41+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/11/judge-ward-frowns-upon-patent-reexamination-gamesmanship</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-11-01T05:16:31+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/does-the-solicitors-office-sufficiently-protect-the-interests-of-the-bpai</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-29T01:37:02+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/practical-impact-of-patent-reissue-pendency</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-28T09:26:49+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/pendency-of-narrowing-patent-reissue-applications</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-24T03:44:26+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/echostar</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-23T22:29:29+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/graphon-patent-portfolio-sinking-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-22T06:12:27+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/cafc-denies-outsourcing-of-inventorship-to-foreign-countries</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-21T05:50:42+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/50-of-broadening-patent-reissues-abandoned-or-still-pending</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-21T05:49:45+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/horse-trading-trends-in-stays-pending-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-20T02:25:42+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/curing-infringement-issues-through-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-19T04:00:53+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/stays-pending-patent-reexamination-sweetening-the-deal</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-13T14:03:27+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/board-of-patent-appeals-interferences-bpai-seeking-chief-apj</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-11T17:15:44+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/should-an-interview-be-granted-to-facilitate-the-filing-of-an-expedited-right-of-appeal-notice</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-11T06:38:55+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/patent-reissue-oaths-can-impact-claim-interpretation</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-08T06:09:46+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/tivos-change-in-horses-leads-to-termination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-07T04:51:20+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/the-itc-end-around-district-court-stays-pending-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-06T21:13:20+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/star-scientific-avoids-termination-of-patent-reexaminations</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-06T16:50:35+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/10/card-activation-technologies-tripped-up-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-10-01T02:44:58+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/tax-professionals-seek-patent-reform-to-ban-tax-strategy-patents</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-30T05:12:51+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/%e2%80%9cremoving%e2%80%9d-a-prior-art-patent-reference-when-37-cfr-1-131-is-unavailable</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-29T12:37:32+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/broadening-patent-reissue-requires-unequivocal-declaration-statement</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-27T15:06:35+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/agreement-to-drop-new-claims-in-patent-reexamination-to-defeat-stay-in-texas-court</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-24T04:51:11+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/patent-owners-largely-decline-to-waive-right-to-patent-owner-statement</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-23T17:55:13+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/extra-special-dispatch-for-some-patent-owners-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-22T04:20:45+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/the-inequitable-conduct-plague-duty-of-disclosure</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-20T05:08:02+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/juniper-networks-successfull-texas-two-step</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-17T04:19:26+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/delaware-district-court-protective-order-practice</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-16T04:51:42+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/protective-orders-reexamination-concurrent-with-litigation-gone-wrong-in-delaware</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-16T04:38:39+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/senate-urges-patent-reform-to-vote</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-15T23:02:34+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/recapture-doctrine-does-not-consider-inconsistent-statements-outside-of-uspto</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-15T04:12:20+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/mercury-cable-patent-reexamination-trash-talk</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-14T04:37:55+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/bpai-clarifies-patent-reissue-recapture-doctrine</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-09T05:01:49+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/death-by-amendment-practical-impacts-of-patent-reexamination-pendency</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-08T05:26:24+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/10-year-pendency-ends-in-defeat-for-patent-owner-in-ex-parte-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-06T23:14:24+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/microsoft-files-another-patent-reexamination-request-against-i4i</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-06T05:16:00+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/patent-reexamination-effectively-terminated-by-bpai-for-lack-of-snq</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-02T04:38:38+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/09/reporters-description-of-invention-at-issue-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-09-01T04:59:40+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/potential-impact-of-patent-reform-on-medical-innovation</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-08-30T03:11:22+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/hr-5980-distracts-from-patent-reform-efforts</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-08-27T06:44:28+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/3484</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-08-26T04:49:47+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/concluded-ex-parte-reexamination-results-not-binding-on-court</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-08-24T18:53:39+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/turning-off-an-inter-partes-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-08-23T04:58:37+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/patent-owner-estopped-from-disputing-key-issue-before-bpai-in-ex-parte-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-08-19T04:21:07+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/bpai-streamlines-appeal-procedures-for-inter-partes-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-08-17T18:15:52+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/patent-owner-preemptive-strikes-to-stymie-inter-partes-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-08-16T05:55:24+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/3387</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-08-12T16:58:37+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/injunctions-a-drastic-remedy-to-be-avoided-by-infringers-applying-the-supreme-court-decision-in-monsanto-to-litigated-patents-pending-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-08-10T19:45:19+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/paving-the-way-for-patent-reform</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-08-10T04:02:44+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/former-administrative-patent-judge-lee-barrett-joins-oblon-reexamination-team</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-08-08T21:27:20+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/uspto-pilot-program-aimed-at-reducing-ex-parte-reexamination-pendency</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-08-06T13:18:29+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/arguments-in-patent-reexamination-trip-up-sigram-schindler</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-08-05T14:04:12+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/bpai-remains-silent-on-claim-construction</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-08-05T04:27:46+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/08/strategic-use-of-patent-reexamination-a-u-s-dominated-practice</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-08-02T14:25:56+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/07/case-stayed-5-years-in-favor-of-inter-partes-reexamination-to-restart</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-07-29T04:51:48+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/07/patent-reexamination-as-a-form-of-damage-control</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-07-28T19:33:54+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/07/examiner-comments-in-prosecution-history-discounted-as-unskilled</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-07-28T04:23:36+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/07/how-long-does-patent-reexamination-take</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-07-23T04:19:26+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/07/another-patent-reissue-question-headed-to-the-cafc</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-07-20T23:48:19+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/07/test-com-reexamination-concludes-with-bpai-reversal</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-07-17T23:24:40+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/07/patent-reform-identified-as-component-of-obama-stimulus-agenda</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-07-16T02:44:50+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/07/new-ntp-patent-suit-relies-on-non-existent-claims</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-07-12T13:37:19+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/07/genetic-technologies-ltd-%e2%80%99s-non-coding-dna-patent-upheld-on-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-07-12T01:29:56+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/07/37-c-f-r-%c2%a7-1-182-petitions-to-request-for-continued-reexamination-rcr</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-07-07T12:36:30+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/07/three-strikes-your-out-apotex%e2%80%99s-latest-attempt-to-invalidate-the-plavix%c2%ae-patent-denied-by-uspto</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-07-07T01:21:40+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/07/third-party-opposition-petitions-in-inter-partes-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-07-05T18:46:38+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/07/senator-leahy-pushes-patent-reform-on-the-heels-of-bilski</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-07-01T14:44:25+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/06/claim-interpretation-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-06-30T01:33:01+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/06/patent-owner-requested-ex-parte-reexamination-boomerangs-in-ex-parte-yasukochi-et-al</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-06-25T04:15:58+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/06/the-harvard-oncomouse-patent-reexamination-over-before-it-started</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-06-22T17:59:59+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/06/stay-pending-reexamination-denied-because-defendant-did-not-raise-invalidity-defense</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-06-22T14:21:24+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/06/paparazzi-photo-kills-ford-design-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-06-16T04:13:59+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/06/jury-to-hear-evidence-of-reexamination-proceedings</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-06-15T19:08:28+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/06/judge-cites-pto-pendency-data-in-denying-stay</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-06-15T15:06:24+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/06/when-confirmed-claims-in-patent-reexamination-equal-defeat</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-06-14T16:39:39+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/06/patent-reform-seminar-next-week-in-dc</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-06-09T05:21:22+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/06/lack-of-evidence-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-06-08T02:35:39+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/06/6-month-view-of-requests-for-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-06-07T03:19:24+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/06/the-need-for-speed-in-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-06-03T03:55:51+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/06/can-inequitable-conduct-be-cured-via-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-06-02T05:26:03+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/06/close-calls-declaration-practice-in-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-06-01T04:52:42+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/failure-to-identify-equivalent-structure-a-non-starter-for-bpai</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-28T05:07:29+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/bpai-to-streamline-appeal-procedures-for-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-26T13:09:51+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/change-in-transitional-phrase-can-trigger-intervening-rights</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-26T04:25:32+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/the-benefits-of-inter-partes-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-25T13:29:18+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/shielding-an-expert-declarant-from-deposition-in-concurrent-litigation</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-20T21:44:55+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/useful-links</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-20T16:42:44+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>weekly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.6</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/judge-folsom-denies-continuation-of-stay-of-patent-litigation-pending-reexamination-of-dymanic-website-technology-patents</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-20T04:33:23+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/patent-reform-undermined-by-house</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-18T21:18:16+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/uspto-releases-patent-reexamination-best-practices</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-18T04:57:40+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/the-sad-case-of-star-scientific-interviews-in-ex-parte-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-17T03:57:52+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/uspto-patent-reform-implementation-hurry-up-wait</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-16T17:20:59+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/schering%e2%80%99s-reissued-bullet-claims-covering-zetia-compound-invalidated-on-summary-judgment</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-15T04:42:14+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/microsoft-and-the-i4i-battle</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-13T04:57:36+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/reexamination-paradox</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-13T04:05:10+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/uspto-to-host-ftc-doj-speakers-may-26th</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-11T03:20:59+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/political-posturing-and-patent-refrom</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-06T20:56:20+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/bpai-rejects-warf-stem-cell-patent-claims-in-inter-partes-reexamination-appeal</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-05T20:04:46+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/bpai-informative-opinion-in-ex-parte-baxter-international-inc-no-2009-006493-18-march-2010-stresses-no-uspto-issue-preclusion-principles-enunciated-in-in-re-swanson</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-05-03T03:16:01+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/patent-reform-by-memorial-day</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-30T18:35:08+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/05/uspto-patent-reform-implementation-fine-tuning-interference-part-i</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-30T17:18:17+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/bpai-emphasizes-obviousness-test-in-reversing-inter-partes-design-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-29T17:29:51+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/judge-seeborg-denies-stay-of-patent-litigation-pending-outcome-of-inter-partes-reexamination-proceedings</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-29T01:18:45+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/judge-payne-denies-stay-eplus-inc-v-lawson-software-inc-pending-outcome-reexamination-of-the-patents-in-suit</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-29T00:35:50+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/comparison-of-invalidation-proceedings-in-sipo-to-inter-partes-reexamination-proceedings-in-the-uspto</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-27T13:05:46+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/judge-payne-denies-stay-eplus-inc-v-lawson-software-inc-pending-outcome-reexamination-of-the-patents-in-suit</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-27T12:02:08+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>weekly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.6</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/patent-law-reform-front-and-center</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-25T04:20:08+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/uspto-releases-1st-quarter-patent-reexamination-statistics</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-23T22:17:45+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/uspto-supports-post-grant-review</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-22T03:35:31+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/2172</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-17T20:47:33+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/cancelled-interference-rule-41-200b-taken-out-of-its-misery</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-16T13:31:56+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/cafc-bpai-apply-wrong-claim-interpretation-standard-to-suitco-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-15T02:05:39+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/patent-reissue-doesnt-fix-everything</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-14T15:15:03+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/first-annual-bpai-conference-april-7-2010</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-13T03:22:46+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/can-you-appeal-a-stay-of-patent-litigation-pending-outcome-of-a-reexamination-proceeding</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-12T04:32:56+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/s-515-provisions-for-a-post-interference-world</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-08T13:10:29+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/preventing-harassment-in-reexamination-is-mpep-%c2%a7-2240-toothless-absent-the-proverbial-smoking-gun</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-06T00:18:13+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/judge-refuses-to-reconsider-decision-to-refuse-to-stay-patent-litigation-pending-the-outcome-of-reexamination-proceedings</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-02T13:49:20+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/04/treatment-of-the-recapture-doctrine-at-the-bpai-post-north-american-container</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-04-02T13:37:29+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/plavix-exits-reexamination-unscathed</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-31T04:59:27+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/preclusions-against-inter-partes-review-or-post-grant-review-proceedings-in-new-s-515</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-30T15:34:32+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/does-the-march-5-2010-version-of-s-515-encourage-commission-of-fraud-on-the-patent-office</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-28T15:11:55+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/merger-considerations-in-patent-reissue-and-inter-partes-patent-reexamination-proceedings</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-26T16:42:21+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/contact-us</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-24T14:50:20+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>weekly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.6</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/texas2step</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-23T21:02:58+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/intervening-rights-the-substantially-identical-standard</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-22T13:56:15+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/expanded-bpai-panel-renders-decision-on-rehearing-on-the-issue-of-claim-construction-in-reexamination-of-an-expired-patent</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-19T13:15:16+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/1654</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-18T04:36:35+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/supplemental-examination-to-consider-reconsider-or-correct-information</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-17T17:59:13+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/top-5-patenspostgrant-com-posts-feb-march</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-16T04:17:14+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/hobbits-wizards-the-amazon-1-click-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-12T17:49:42+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/recourse-for-abuse-of-reexamination-process</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-12T17:46:09+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/uspto-offers-best-practice-tips-for-reissues</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-10T04:59:58+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/1609</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-08T23:56:21+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/epo-opposition-procedures-a-comparison-with-inter-partes-reexamination-in-the-uspto</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-07T20:11:59+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/post-grant-review-changes-to-s-515-taking-shape</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-05T05:37:29+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/1532</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-04T01:45:41+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/stacking-the-deck-against-viagra</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-03-03T05:17:37+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/03/one-two-punch</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-28T05:17:40+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/deal-appears-imminent-on-patent-reform-legislation</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-26T05:40:57+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/the-uspto%e2%80%99s-central-reexamination-unit</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-25T02:41:59+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/upcoming-post-grant-cle-opportunities</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-24T19:00:34+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/making-your-reexamination-news-risky-business</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-24T05:20:37+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/ex-parte-tanaka-heading-to-cafc</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-24T00:22:18+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/1401</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-18T04:25:11+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/peeling-back-the-layers-of-tanaka-patent-owner-initiated-reexamination-as-an-alternative-to-reissue</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-17T05:25:17+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/design-patents-reexamination-an-interview-with-industrial-design-expert-philippe-signore</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-16T21:14:24+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/does-mpep-22582658-h-encourage-improper-reexamination-requests</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-16T05:25:42+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/seeking-a-stay-of-patent-litigation-a-factors-based-analysis</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-10T18:12:10+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/effectively-presenting-a-request-for-patent-reexamination-part-ii-what-exactly-is-a-substantial-new-question-of-patentability-anyway</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-10T06:11:33+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/is-evidence-of-a-concurrent-reexamination-admissible-in-litigation-part-iv-of-iv</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-08T20:08:24+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/patent-reform-percolating</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-06T16:58:01+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/upcoming-pli-presentations-and-webcasts-reexamination-reissue</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-03T06:21:30+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/are-the-rambus-patent-rexaminations-irrelevant</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-02T05:19:08+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/uspto-reexamination-of-means-plus-function-claims</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-02-01T01:29:25+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/02/is-evidence-of-a-concurrent-reexamination-admissible-in-litigation-part-iii-of-iv</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-01-31T05:01:43+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/moving-toward-a-more-efficient-inter-partes-reexamination-proceeding</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-01-29T05:47:54+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/patent-office-releases-2009-reexamination-stats</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-01-27T16:28:30+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/is-evidence-of-a-concurrent-reexamination-admissible-in-litigation-part-ii-of-iv</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-01-22T05:34:46+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/husky%e2%80%99s-motion-for-stay-of-patent-litigation-denied-when-requests-for-reexamination-of-the-three-patents-in-suit-had-not-yet-received-filing-dates</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-01-22T05:33:48+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/is-evidence-of-a-concurrent-reexamination-admissible-in-litigation</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-01-20T22:31:47+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/fotomedia-patents-finally-rejected-in-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-01-19T22:48:09+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/cook%e2%80%99s-patent-litigation-against-endologix-stayed-pending-reexamination-of-the-stent-patents-in-suit</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-01-18T01:00:22+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/%e2%80%9cnose-of-wax%e2%80%9d-revisited-and-should-35-usc-%c2%a7-145-be-revised-to-apply-to-reexaminations</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-01-15T16:30:59+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/is-the-declaration-of-an-interference-enough-to-stay-a-district-court-litigation</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-01-15T16:30:28+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/to-search-or-not-to-search-for-prior-art-when-contemplating-whether-to-request-an-inter-partes-reexamination-or-an-interference</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-01-15T05:23:33+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/district-court-grants-stay-prior-to-grant-of-request-for-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-01-14T21:30:40+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/are-patent-trolls-more-vulnerable-to-reexamination-in-the-eastern-district-of-texas</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-01-10T05:37:14+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/stay-pending-reexamination-denied-because-a-stay-would-result-in-more-significant-prejudice-given-the-courts-overall-speed-in-disposing-patent-cases</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-01-10T05:35:10+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/effectively-presenting-a-request-for-patent-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-01-09T05:16:13+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/attacking-patent-holder-declaration-evidence-via-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2010-01-06T15:24:10+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/bpai-affirms-rejection-of-patent-reexaminations-of-ntp-v-rim-fame</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-26T02:30:43+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/reexamination-concurrent-with-litigation-malpractice-considerations-n-d-ill</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-26T02:26:19+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/singulair-reexamination-advances-to-favorable-conclusion</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-26T02:22:27+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/e-d-va-declines-sigram-schindlers-bid-to-revisit-options-for-review-of-bpai-decisions-in-ex-parte-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-26T02:19:22+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/726</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-26T01:23:01+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/satisfying-the-duty-of-disclosure-in-reexamination-concurrent-with-litigation-without-violating-a-protective-order</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-22T15:11:48+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/is-the-mere-existence-of-a-newly-filed-inter-partes-reexamination-request-enough-to-stay-a-district-court-litigation</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-21T03:09:19+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2010/01/use-of-assignee-consent-and-oathdeclaration-from-parent-reissue-application-in-a-continuation-reissue-is-there-an-exception-to-mpep-%c2%a7-1451</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-18T16:32:12+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/is-the-estoppel-effect-of-inter-partes-reexamination-a-valid-deterrent-to-filing-part-2-of-2</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-17T19:06:53+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/when-is-a-supplemental-reissue-oath-declaration-required</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-17T00:09:38+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/is-the-estoppel-effect-of-inter-partes-reexamination-a-valid-deterrent-to-filing-part-1-of-2</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-16T15:58:57+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/an-inter-partes-reexamination-primer-part-1-of-2</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-13T04:00:44+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/the-evolution-of-mpep-22822686</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-10T14:09:50+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/ex-parte-brp-us-inc</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-09T15:23:05+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/final-decision-ex-parte-patrick-d-mccarthy</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-09T15:22:42+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/roy-g-biv-corporation</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-09T15:22:21+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/in-re-troll-busters-beware-failure-to-disclose-real-party-in-interest-when-filing-an-inter-partes-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-09T15:21:16+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/avoiding-reliance-on-the-doctrine-of-equivalents-through-patent-reissuance</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-08T00:18:43+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/bpai-reexamination-appeals-statistics-for-fy-09</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-08T00:17:15+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/concurrent-proceedings-patent-owner-compliance-with-mpep-%c2%a7-2282</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-06T16:24:18+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/ipos-pto-day-conference-december-7-2009</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-01T20:55:37+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/are-patent-claims-treated-like-a-%e2%80%9cnose-of-wax%e2%80%9d-at-the-u-s-p-t-o</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-01T14:28:42+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/are-patent-claims-treated-like-a-%e2%80%9cnose-of-wax%e2%80%9d-at-the-u-s-p-t-o</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-12-01T00:27:42+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>weekly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.6</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/the-bpai-finds-patents-claims-in-reexamination-proceeding-indefinite</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-23T18:11:17+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/patent-reform-derailed-again</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-20T16:23:24+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/attacking-a-patent-in-reexamination-for-lack-of-written-description-and-enablement</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-18T23:47:29+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/are-the-principles-set-forth-in-ex-parte-bayles-good-law-do-these-principles-apply-to-continuation-reissues</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-18T12:43:25+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/inter-partes-reexamination-primer-part-2-of-2</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-18T12:35:57+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/patent-praxis-the-innocuous-examiner-amendment</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-17T16:13:12+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/the-role-of-opla-in-reexamination-proceedings-part-2-of-3</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-17T16:09:09+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/the-role-of-opla-in-reexamination-proceedings</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-17T16:04:21+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/12/the-role-of-opla-in-reexamination-proceedings-part-3-of-3</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-17T15:57:44+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/the-role-of-opla-in-reexamination-proceedings-part-2-of-3</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-17T15:54:25+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>weekly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.6</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/merck%e2%80%99s-singulair-patent-survives-reexamination</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-16T20:36:42+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/inter-partes-reexamination-the-international-trade-commission-itc</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-13T20:04:08+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/strategic-application-of-patent-reexamination-in-litigation-avoiding-a-preliminary-injunction</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-13T20:01:47+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/options-for-judicial-review-of-ex-parte-reexamination-decisions</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-13T19:58:52+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/2009/11/merged-post-grant-proceedings</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-13T19:58:20+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.2</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/subscribe</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-08T18:00:34+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>weekly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.6</priority>
	</url>
	<url>
		<loc>http://www.patentspostgrant.com/lang/en/top-5-blog-posts</loc>
		<lastmod>2009-11-08T18:00:18+00:00</lastmod>
		<changefreq>weekly</changefreq>
		<priority>0.6</priority>
	</url>
</urlset>
