“Known or Used” Not a Side-Step to PTAB Estoppel
Keeping with yesterday’s discussion of Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) estoppel in the district courts, a decision from earlier this year on yet another aspect of this estoppel has been recalibrated. Back in January, the Central District of California explained in The California Institute of Technology v. Broadcom Limited, et al., that IPR estoppel (35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2)) applies where the same IPR reference is later raised in court under the “known or used” prong of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) instead of as a “patent or printed publication” as done in the IPR.
Upon Motion for reconsideration, the Court has agreed that it’s earlier Order required further clarification. Continue Reading Courts Continue to Explore Reach of PTAB Estoppel & Standards for Assessing Exceptions